The Line
A lot has happened in the past two weeks in the bizarre world of teaching, a world unto itself in which one must adapt to survive, only the very definition of adapting has been changed. In the normal world, someone or something adapts and in so doing changes something about itself but still retains its essential “self.” A teacher must adapt by becoming less, by divesting talent and experience and ambition and creativity to satisfy the lowest common denominator: which in today’s world is stupidity. This absurdist play will surely one day be revealed by a trickster demon who will throw back the curtain, exposing the rafters and light tracks, and say with a shrug, “Ha, I was just having a bit of fun.”
A unique aspect of teaching in relation to other careers is teachers almost never do the same thing twice. I’ve heard of some teachers with the luxury of creating materials that they use from year to year, but I’ve never tasted that bit of heaven. I’ve had more continuity between this year and last year than I’ve ever had; I’m teaching the same subject and the same grade and much of the same content, but as with every year, I have a completely new crop of students who bring along with them a completely new mixture of abilities, weaknesses, and challenges. And I supposed rewards.
I said “almost never” above because teachers do get to do the same thing over again. But in the weirdest fashion. Take the first day of school. I show up with my exciting sense of renewal on that first day of school, give it my all, and at the end of it sit down to reflect on my performance. The next time I get to implement what I’ve learned from my reflection: 364 days later. If I teach for 30 years, I will teach only 30 first days. Only 30 first marking period parent-teacher conferences. Only 30 returns from Christmas breaks. And so on. How good can one get at something after doing it only 30 times in 30 years? Yet teachers are expected to be experts. And teachers are expected to give students multiple opportunities to master basic concepts. It’s just an odd profession.
So every year teachers arrive to work in August pie-eyed with enthusiasm and optimism from a summer of relaxation and reinvigoration. All those obstacles I faced last year? They’ll vanish in the face of the new method I’ve developed. Defeated last year to the point that you drank too much, ate too much, watched too much bad TV, or became that terrible person you promised yourself you never would become? Solved and absolved in the light of your newfound Positive Mental Attitude.
We report to work in August with reasonable and honest expectations. We expect to be able to apply the lessons we’ve learned in the past year, and in all the past years, to what we’re going to do this year. We expect to grow creatively, to struggle, and ultimately to succeed. We draw a line, one that represents all these expectations for us, but also for our bosses, our students, and their parents. And that sunny disposition hard-earned over what on the outside looked like a relaxing summer, but on the inside, yes below that enviable tan and few extra pounds from sleeping later and doing less physically, was a war zone, a desperate battle to deny the Negativity from winning, to offer safe harbor to Sanity, and to salvage what we can of the remnants of the Lost and Scattered Tribes of Self-Esteem, Success, and Ambition.
But teaching, at least for me, has been a continual yearly retreat of that line. I’ve had to draw my forces in because they are being routed. I could go on about who and what is destroying my forces, but that’s for another time. Suffice it to say now, teachers, that it feels like the world stopped revolving around the sun and we’re stuck in September. And that all the other months have been squeezed into what were supposed to be short weeks before October and the school year got into full swing. Well, we’re swinging alright; just not in the way I’d hoped for in those heady summer days.
And now some news:
In the Lost Leadership category:
– As I walked down the hallway past the main lobby one morning, I passed a security guard standing with a child splashed with white liquid. A principal approaches and says, “Why’s he wearing milk, this early in the morning?”
Because the afternoon is a better time to wear milk.
– A principal came on the loudspeaker to say someone’s car needed to be moved. It was a Dodge Laredo. Pause reading here and pronounce the model of the car.
Hopefully you said “La-ray-dough.”
The principal said “La-red-o.”
In the Our Future is Doomed, But At Least It’ll Be Humorous category:
– Two students completing an exercise on stereotypes in which they must match a person’s picture with who or what they are.
Student 1: “That’s Maya Angelou.”
Student 2: “I don’t care!”
– A student confused about the fact that not every student has English the same time he does: “So some people have math?”
– A student, out of the blue and loud enough for the class to hear: “Oh my gosh, I missed my medication.” (Thankfully it was for asthma.)
– A student during a lesson in which I was using Spongebob as an example (I use Mr. Squarepants all the time.): “Plankton isn’t a pickle?”
– Although immune to students’ comments about my appearance because I’ve heard it all and it’s just old to me, this one made me pause: “You look like you got struck by lightning.” I couldn’t get an intelligible answer about why I looked like that, but I did get the impression it wasn’t supposed to be an insult.
– Students were required to write about a movie script they would develop that wouldn’t be pedestrian, one of their vocabulary words. One child, obviously not understanding the meaning of pedestrian, amongst his other problems, said he would include some scary monsters like “Freddy Cougar.”
And in the Teachers Need to Drink More, Not Less category:
I meant to write “Read IEPs.” Something else was obviously on my mind. And the worst part is that I didn’t realize my mistake for about a week.
So that’s it for This Week in Teaching. Plenty of strange occurrences hit the cutting room floor – like the meeting in which every teacher present experienced the strongest case of déjà vu in which we conducted the exact same conversation about problem student behavior that we have every year; and the near-discipline meeting I had because a princ-bureaucrat-ipal reads the letter of the law and as a teacher one needs to implement the spirit of the law to adapt it to one’s students – but perhaps they’ll resurface with a push of anger at a later time. In fact, I’d bet on that.
Comments